Wal-Mart Repositions on Apparel, Prepares for Layoffs

Posted by Alex Goldschmidt

After failing miserably at it’s attempt at high fashion, Wal-Mart is planning to lay off up to 200 employees from its apparel division, and move several more to New York. Considering how much trouble the company has had with its clothing line, it seems like the company should be hiring, not firing. Perhaps the company is planning to understaff (PDF) its headquarters as well as its stores.

Wal-Mart Shuffles Apparel Division [Northwest Arkansas Morning News]

The Big Apple is taking a bite out of Bentonville, but it isn’t the big bite that was expected.

Home office employees of Wal-Mart’s apparel division are bracing for final word on a mass reorganization that could eliminate up to 200 jobs, while shifting others to New York.

Sources close to and within the retailer said product sourcing jobs and some positions in product development and design may be eliminated as the retailer explores deals with new labels and restructures buying positions to absorb other duties. Most of the remaining apparel staff of up to 900 employees will shift to a new location two miles northeast of the home office, while some employees will be asked to transfer to an expanding New York office.

When the reorganization will become final is unknown. Wal-Mart employs about 12,800 at the home office.

Read the rest of this story ...

2 comments

Only Half of Wal-Mart Employees Use Company Health Plan

Posted by Alex Goldschmidt

Wal-Mart announced enrollment numbers for the company’s health plan today, revealing that just barely half of Wal-Mart’s employees choose to enroll in the company’s plan. 7.3% of the company’s employees remain uninsured, a figure which does include the number of employees using state-funded health care.

Wal-Mart offers several different health care plans and the company’s release failed to note how many employees are enrolled in each of the different plans. The cheapest plan available - the one most accessible to an employee making the Wal-Mart average of $20,000 a year - offers very little coverage and high deductibles, making it all but useless for enrollees. For a closer look at the specifics of Wal-Mart’s health plan, see this New York Times’ article from November, 2007.

The company’s announcement today highlights the fact that Wal-Mart is only looking to placate its critics, not improve employee benefits. Rather than making substantive changes to its corporate practices, Wal-Mart is looking to do the least work possible while still improving its image. If the company’s health care plan improved as much as it claims, employees would be jumping to subscribe. Instead, the company failed to convince even 3% of its Associates to join, with many choosing to remain uninsured rather than be on the company plan. Wal-Mart might be the largest retailer in the world, but it has a pretty hard time selling health care to its own employees.

Wal-Mart: More Employees Have Health Coverage Than Last Year [Arkansas Business]

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. of Bentonville on Tuesday said the number of its workers without health insurance has fallen in the last year.

The world’s largest retailer said 7.3 percent of its workers had no health insurance, down from 9.6 percent a year ago. Wal-Mart credited its new “associate-tailored” plans for the decrease.

Read the rest of this story ...

57 comments

Pennsylvania Wal-Mart Manager files Gender Discrimination Suit

Posted by Media Team

The former manager of a Pennsylvania Wal-Mart store has filed suit against the company, alleging that she was fired for “not being truthful” in interviews about her relationship with a fellow employee. Helen Masonis claims that not only was she truthful in said interviews, but also that male employees in similar situations were allowed to remain at the company. Masonis joins the ranks of over a million women suing Wal-Mart for gender discrimination. Read more about these and other cases on our Women’s Rights at Wal-Mart page.

*UPDATE*
The complaint, filed by Masonis on January 18th, points out a couple interesting facts. First, there is the allegation that Wal-Mart management knew Masonis’s in-store relationship did not violate Wal-mart’s fraternization policy, yet still required her to sit through two closed-door “investigative interviews.” The official Wal-Mart “Exit Interview” given after Masonis was terminated confirmed Masonis had not violated the policy.

Masonis also calls out five male managers, each of which had either improper relationships with fellow female employees directly under their supervision, or were accused of harrassment, and none of them were fired or subjected to “investigative interviews.” You can read the whole complaint here.

It appears that the interview statements of Masonis and her male “friend”, Ward Thomas, gave differing accounts of what happened, but that it was only Masonis, and not Thomas, that was terminated. It will be interesting to find out the actual fate of Ward, so stay tuned.

Wal-Mart lawsuit over gender bias [Altoona Mirror (Penn.)]

A former department manager at the Wal-Mart Distribution Center in Clearfield County, who had an affair with an employee, is claiming gender discrimination against the company.

Helen Masonis of Falls Creek said she was fired for having a relationship with a male employee while several male managers who had affairs with employees were not fired.

Masonis is requesting a federal judge order back pay and employment benefits, compensatory and punitive damages, as well as pay her attorney fees and issue injunctions that would reinstate her and bar further discrimination against her.

The lawsuit filed in U.S. court in Johnstown lists the names of other males and females who had affairs at Wal-Mart. She charges that the males never were disciplined.

Read the rest of this story ...

17 comments

Wal-Mart’s Debit Card: Cashing In on Low-Income Shoppers

Posted by Alex Goldschmidt

We’ve mentioned here before that Wal-Mart profits off poverty in a number of ways. The economy’s recent slow-down has meant booming business for Wal-Mart, and the company has little incentive to pay higher wages that would allow its employees to shop elsewhere. This post from Consumerist points out one more way that Wal-Mart is taking advantage of its customers’ poverty:

Walmart’s Debit Card Has Lots Of Hidden Fees [Consumerist]

El banco del Walmart is issuing pre-paid debit cards, and like everything else at Walmart, they suck. Here’s some of the hidden fees:

  • Card issue fee: $8.94
  • Reload the card with more money: $4.64
  • ATM transaction fee: $1.95
  • ATM balance inquiry: $0.75
  • Monthly maintenance fee: $4.94
  • Statement fee: $2.00

Great idea, tap into the “unbanked,” and then rip them off. Here’s an even better idea for potential Walmart Debit Card users: cash! No fees!

Click here to see the specific terms and conditions.

44 comments

Wal-Mart To Stop Carrying Over 1,000 Magazines

Posted by Alex Goldschmidt

The New York Post reports that Wal-Mart is planning to stop carrying more than 1,000 magazine titles, essentially crippling the industry. The retailer’s motivations for the move are unclear, but said one company executive: “I used to think pouring salt on slugs was fun, but this is WAAY better! Maybe even more fun than when we put all those locally-owned supermarkets out of business! I mean, this is freakin’ AWESOME!” From Advertising Age:

The New York Post reports that Wal-Mart is tossing more than 1,000 magazines from the racks in its stores, sending a shock wave through the industry. Wal-Mart, which released its official purge list Jan. 15, is believed to be responsible for generating more than 20% of all retail magazine sales in the U.S. One of the biggest corporate losers appears to be Meredith Publishing. Its flagship Better Homes & Gardens is out, as is sibling service magazine Ladies’ Home Journal. Family Circle stays, however. Read who else is out, and who gets to stay.

More from the New York Post >>

19 comments

Pressuring Suppliers: Wal-Mart Demands RFID Tags

Posted by Alex Goldschmidt

RFID tagging, aside from being controversial for privacy reasons, is a prime example of how Wal-Mart forces the hand of its suppliers. The company is demanding that all suppliers use radio frequency identification (RFID) tags on their products: the tags make it easier for Wal-Mart to track its inventory, but cost a significant amount for suppliers to implement. Companies failing to meet Wal-Mart’s demands will be fined $2 a pallet, a figure which quickly adds up when supplying thousands of stores. Wal-Mart is ostensibly forcing its suppliers to invest in Wal-Mart-specific technologies...or pay the price. This kind of power allows Wal-Mart to bully suppliers in a number of ways: most recently, to bring greener packaging to its stores, but also to demand lower costs, often leading companies to ship labor overseas or scrimp on product quality. Is domination by a single company what they meant by “free” market?

Wal-Mart Sets Deadline For Sam’s Club Suppliers To Use RFID [InformationWeek]

Wal-Mart is stepping up pressure on suppliers to comply with its three-year-old RFID mandate. The retailer says it will charge a $2 fee for each pallet not tagged with RFID that comes into a Texas distribution center for its Sam’s Club warehouse stores beginning Jan. 30.

Wal-Mart also has told suppliers that in less than three years, all Sam’s Club products passing through 22 distribution centers need to be tagged with RFID at the selling-unit item level.

Read the rest of this story ...

53 comments

Wal-Mart Opens 4 “Efficient” Stores - Only 6,796 Energy Hogs to Go

Posted by Alex Goldschmidt

Wal-Mart announced plans today for four new “energy-efficient” stores, the first which will open in Illinois later this month. Utilizing new refrigeration techniques and LED lighting, the new stores are projected to be 25% more efficient than the usual Supercenter. The company touts the efficient stores as not only green, but cheaper, too, though as an article out today from BusinessWeek points out:

    “When Wal-Mart (WMT) tells their suppliers to stop shipping in [costly] bulky packaging, it’s not for the consumer. It’s for the company,” Leimsider said. “The good news is that the green revolution is moving beyond corporate reputation issues.”

And reputation has a lot to do with it. If the company is saving money AND winning acclaim with its new stores, why aren’t all 170+ new stores this year going to be green? Perhaps because Wal-Mart’s just looking for a little breathing room:

    Under fire from labor unions and employee groups, Wal-Mart has embraced the environment as a way to improve its image and cut costs. The retailer launched a plan in 2005 to make Wal-Mart more eco-friendly, from the products it carries on its shelves to the energy it uses to operate its stores to the fuel efficiency of its truck fleets.

The company’s initiatives are definitely a step in the right direction, but they’re incrimental and certainly don’t earn the retailer a free pass on environmental issues. It’s more important now than ever to keep pressure on the company to follow through on its environmental promises. To help this effort, join our environmental task force at http://walmartwatch.com/environment.

Wal-Mart to open eco-friendly superstore in Romeoville [Chicago Tribune]

Read the rest of this story ...

11 comments

Exporting Jobs, Importing Poverty

Posted by Alex Goldschmidt

Two different stories out today - one from the Associated Press (here) and one from the New York Times (below) - both examine the devastation of American blue collar jobs. In an economy where manufacturing jobs are exported overseas, many working class Americans are forced between a rock and a hard place economically. The Associated Press piece explains that many people are turning to drug dealing because “‘I can make a lot more money swinging crack than working at Wal-Mart.’”

In the wake of massive factory closings across the country and the destruction of Main Street businesses, Wal-Mart is often one of the only employment options available. Far from being the savior of rural America, as the company sells itself, Wal-Mart is the ultimate end of a race-to-the-bottom economy. Does middle America need more Wal-Mart’s? Hardly.

Blue-Collar Jobs Disappear, Taking Families’ Way of Life Along [New York Times]

After 30 years at a factory making truck parts, Jeffrey Evans was earning $14.55 an hour in what he called “one of the better-paying jobs in the area.”

Wearing a Harley-Davidson cap, a bittersweet reminder of crushed dreams, he recently described how astonished and betrayed he felt when the plant was shut down in August after a labor dispute. Despite sporadic construction work, Mr. Evans has seen his income reduced by half.

So he was astonished yet again to find himself, at age 49, selling off his cherished Harley and most of his apartment furniture and moving in with his mother.

Read the rest of this story ...

48 comments

Page 54 of 65 pages « First  <  52 53 54 55 56 >  Last »